[ The PC Guide | System
Care Guide | Backups and Disaster Recovery | Backup Methods, Devices and Media ]
Comparison of Backup Method Characteristics
In order to help you understand how the various backup methods compare to each other
and help you make a decision about which one makes the most sense for you, I have enclosed
the chart below. It evaluates the various backup methods in several different important
general areas. These areas are:
- Capacity: How much does the medium store, relative to current average
hard disks? Is it likely that an average user's hard disk will fit onto one or maybe two
pieces of media for the device/method?
- Automatability: How possible is it to fully automate the backup so that
it happens without any user intervention at all?
- Minimized Startup Cost: How well does the method minimize startup costs
for hardware or software?
- Minimized Media Cost: Does the method allow additional backups at a
reasonable cost?
- Expandability: How possible is it to do more backups, or add additional
backup media if needed?
- Reliability: In general terms--because this varies widely based
on the type of device for items such as tape drives--how likely is it that if you have a
disaster and need to restore from the backup, it will work for you?
- Simplicity / Convenience: How easy is the method to use? Is there any
difficulty associated with the method that would tend to discourage doing backups?
- Universality: How common is the hardware used for the method? If you
needed to use the device in five years, how likely is it that you could find support or
additional media for it?
- Performance: How fast is the hardware and software used for the method?
How much time will it take to do a backup?
- Routine Potential: In general, how likely is it that, using this
method, someone is likely to settle into a backup routine and stick with it?
Here is the chart; for all items, "High" is better and "Low" is
worse (I inverted the cost items so that high had a better meaning and low worse, to keep
things consistent, sorry if it is confusing):
Characteristic |
Floppy Disks |
Tape Drives |
Removable Storage
Drives |
Removable Hard Disks |
In-Place Hard Disk
Duplication |
Network Backup |
File Archiving |
Capacity |
Very Low |
High |
Low to High |
High |
High |
High |
-- |
Automatability |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
High |
High |
High |
Minimized Startup
Cost |
Very High |
Low to High |
Low to Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
Very High |
Minimized Media Cost |
Low |
Moderate to High |
Low to Moderate |
Moderate |
Very Low |
Very High |
Very High |
Expandability |
High |
High |
High |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Very High |
High |
Reliability |
Low |
Low to High |
Moderate to High |
Moderate to High |
High |
Very High |
Very High |
Simplicity /
Convenience |
Moderate |
Moderate to High |
Moderate to High |
Low |
Very High |
Moderate |
High |
Universality |
Very High |
Low to High |
Low to Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
High |
High |
Performance |
Very Low |
Low to Moderate |
Low to High |
Very High |
Very High |
Moderate to High |
Very High |
Routine Potential |
Very Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate to High |
High |
Very High |
Note: For a more complete
picture on how the various methods stack up, make sure to check out how they cover the various risks to your data as well.
Many of the methods that look very attractive based on what you see above actually don't
protect against enough of the data risks that you use backups for, to make them truly
viable options.
Next: Backup Scheduling
and Media Rotation Systems
Home - Search
- Topics - Up
|